Just Substitute Guns For Abortion Rights

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday turned away an emergency application asking it to block a Texas law that requires doctors performing abortions to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital.

The decision was effectively 5 to 4 and split along ideological lines.

The effect of the ruling, Justice Stephen G. Breyer wrote for the four dissenters, was to leave 24 counties in the Rio Grande Valley without abortion clinics. “It may,” he added, “substantially reduce access to safe abortions elsewhere in Texas.”

Abortion rights groups and clinics said the law served no medical purpose and was forcing a third of the state’s 36 abortion clinics to stop performing the procedure, preventing some 20,000 women a year from access to safe abortions.

State officials told the court that the law, which requires that doctors have hospital admitting privileges within 30 miles of where they perform abortions, protects public health by “fostering a woman’s ability to seek consultation and treatment for complications directly from her physician.”

The officials added that the impact of the law was modest, saying that more than 90 percent of women seeking abortions in the state will still live within 100 miles of an abortion clinic.

What if this law were about making the gun-totin’ dudes drive 100 miles to buy a firearm?   I bet we’d hear plenty about how they would be “impacted.”

8 thoughts on “Just Substitute Guns For Abortion Rights

  1. If only they gave a rats patooty about the child after it is born. It has long been my belief that men’s intelligence decreases in direct proportation to the numbers of men in a group.
    A few guys, intelligence number not bad. Add more guys to the equation and the intelligence number drops dramatically. Given the number of men in Texas government — well you get the picture.


  2. No question…women’s rights to safe medical procedures are always subject to the “religious rights” of someone else. Wish the Supremes would get some backbone. You’d think they were getting elected or something.


  3. Ugh! Moving backwards… Saw a comment recently — attributed to Joycelyn Elders — that we should abandon our love affair with the fetus, and get back to loving the child….


Okay. Your turn!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s